{"id":3584,"date":"2025-05-09T12:42:45","date_gmt":"2025-05-09T12:42:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/knobgear.com\/?p=3584"},"modified":"2025-05-09T12:56:16","modified_gmt":"2025-05-09T12:56:16","slug":"criticism-of-the-currently-accepted-theory-of-global-warming-due-to-the-effect-of-greenhouse-gases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/knobgear.com\/cs\/criticism-of-the-currently-accepted-theory-of-global-warming-due-to-the-effect-of-greenhouse-gases\/","title":{"rendered":"Kritika v sou\u010dasnosti obecn\u011b uzn\u00e1van\u00e9 \nTeorie glob\u00e1ln\u00edho oteplov\u00e1n\u00ed vlivem p\u016fsoben\u00ed sklen\u00edkov\u00fdch plyn\u016f."},"content":{"rendered":"

Jsem profes\u00ed stroja\u0159. Absolvoval jsem pr\u016fmyslovku s leteck\u00fdm zam\u011b\u0159en\u00edm a pak jsem studoval na \u010cVUT dopravn\u00ed a manipula\u010dn\u00ed techniku se specializac\u00ed spalovac\u00ed motory. Pro v\u00e1\u017en\u00e9 zdravotn\u00ed pot\u00ed\u017ee jsem v 5. ro\u010dn\u00edku ukon\u010dil studium. Byl jsem mysl\u00edm dobr\u00fd student. V\u0161echny zkou\u0161ky z matematiky, fyziky, mechaniky, elektrotechniky a dal\u0161\u00edch technick\u00fdch p\u0159edm\u011bt\u016f jsem slo\u017eil na prvn\u00ed term\u00edn a zpravidla na zn\u00e1mku 1 nebo 2. T\u00edm, \u017ee jsem studoval spalovac\u00ed motory, m\u00e1m mysl\u00edm krom z\u00e1kladn\u00edch matematick\u00fdch a fyzik\u00e1ln\u00edch v\u011bdomost\u00ed i n\u011bjak\u00e9 odborn\u00e9 v\u011bdomosti obecn\u011b o tepeln\u00fdch stroj\u00edch a energetick\u00fdch zdroj\u00edch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dlouho jsem spory o klimatick\u00e9 zm\u011bny nesledoval. M\u011bl jsem v\u017edy za to, \u017ee hlavn\u00ed p\u0159\u00ed\u010dina je jasn\u011b patrn\u00e1, a tou je popula\u010dn\u00ed exploze lidsk\u00e9 civilizace. D\u00e1le jsem byl v\u017edy p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010den, \u017ee je na sv\u011bt\u011b dostatek odborn\u00edk\u016f zkoumaj\u00edc\u00ed tyto probl\u00e9my. Toto t\u00e9ma m\u011b za\u010dalo v\u00edce zaj\u00edmat, kdy\u017e se za\u010dala prosazovat elektromobilita v doprav\u011b na z\u00e1klad\u011b zav\u00e1d\u011bj\u00edc\u00edch a \u010dasto zcela nepravdiv\u00fdch informac\u00ed. P\u0159edn\u00ed odborn\u00edci z oboru energetiky, dopravy a pohonn\u00fdch jednotek v cel\u00e9 Evrop\u011b ji\u017e mnoho let varuj\u00ed veden\u00ed EU p\u0159ed \u0159adou technick\u00fdch, ekonomick\u00fdch a soci\u00e1ln\u00edch rizik, kter\u00e1 toto vysloven\u011b politick\u00e9 rozhodnut\u00ed bude doprov\u00e1zet. Ukazuje se ale, \u017ee marn\u011b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To m\u011b tedy p\u0159im\u011blo za\u010d\u00edt v\u00edce studovat argumenty klimatick\u00fdch aktivist\u016f a jejich oponent\u016f. Byl jsem velmi p\u0159ekvapen informacemi a \u00fadaji v jedin\u00e9 sou\u010dasn\u011b uzn\u00e1van\u00e9 Teorii glob\u00e1ln\u00edho oteplov\u00e1n\u00ed a to vlivem p\u016fsoben\u00ed sklen\u00edkov\u00fdch plyn\u016f. J\u00e1 bych tuto teorii nazval stru\u010dn\u011b sp\u00ed\u0161e Teori\u00ed \u0161kodlivosti CO2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

D\u0159\u00edve ne\u017e za\u010dnu s rozborem a kritikou t\u00e9to teorie bych cht\u011bl uv\u00e9zt, \u017ee moje ambice nen\u00ed tvrzen\u00ed, \u017ee j\u00e1 uvedu n\u011bjakou univerz\u00e1ln\u00ed hlavn\u00ed p\u0159\u00ed\u010dinu oteplov\u00e1n\u00ed. Chci se pod\u011blit o informace ze sv\u00e9ho studia, sv\u00e9 pochybnosti i z\u00e1v\u011bry. Sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed seriozn\u00ed v\u011bdy by m\u011bla b\u00fdt svobodn\u00e1 diskuse a v\u011bdeck\u00e9 posuzov\u00e1n\u00ed argument\u016f.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prvn\u00ed moje p\u0159ekvapen\u00ed p\u0159i zkoum\u00e1n\u00ed Teorii glob\u00e1ln\u00edho oteplov\u00e1n\u00ed se t\u00fdkalo mno\u017estv\u00ed CO2 v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e. P\u0159es to, \u017ee o CO2 sly\u0161\u00edme v m\u00e9di\u00edch prakticky denn\u011b, nepoda\u0159ilo se mi naj\u00edt v m\u00e9m okol\u00ed osobu, kter\u00e1 by na ot\u00e1zku kolik je CO2 v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e um\u011bla spr\u00e1vn\u011b odpov\u011bd\u011bt. Podle informac\u00ed z m\u00e9di\u00ed m\u00e1 v\u011bt\u0161ina lid\u00ed pocit, \u017ee se za\u010dneme brzy vlivem CO2 dusit. V pr\u016fm\u011bru je absolutn\u00ed pod\u00edl CO2 v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e Zem\u011b slovy \u010dty\u0159i des\u00edtitis\u00edciny celku. Nebo lze \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee jsou to \u010dty\u0159i setiny procenta, nebo \u010dty\u0159i desetiny promile atmosf\u00e9ry. Je to stopov\u00e9 mno\u017estv\u00ed. Za posledn\u00ed stolet\u00ed jeho pod\u00edl v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e stoupl o jednu desetitis\u00edcinu. Tedy o jednu setinu procenta. N\u00e1r\u016fst byl z 0,03% na 0,04%. Relativn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edr\u016fstek je tedy p\u0159ibli\u017en\u011b o 30% proti stavu p\u0159ed 100 lety. To je tedy kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00fd argument klimatolog\u016f, \u017ee ten relativn\u00ed n\u00e1r\u016fst je ohromn\u00fd. D\u016fkazem uv\u00e1d\u011bj\u00ed grafy n\u00e1r\u016fstu mno\u017estv\u00ed CO2 a n\u00e1r\u016fstu pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00e9 teploty v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e. Vid\u00ed zde vz\u00e1jemnou souvislost. N\u00e1r\u016fst CO2 je ale tak\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edmo z\u00e1visl\u00fd na spot\u0159eb\u011b energie lidstva a tak\u00e9 na mno\u017estv\u00ed obyvatel na Zemi. Tyto z\u00e1vislosti ale klimatologov\u00e9 neuv\u00e1d\u011bj\u00ed a nepracuj\u00ed s nimi. Obyvatel je p\u011btin\u00e1sobek, p\u0159ibylo +400% a emitovan\u00e1 tepeln\u00e1 energie lidstva stoupla d\u00edky technick\u00e9mu pokroku \u0159\u00e1dov\u011b o +1000%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Druh\u00e9 m\u00e9 p\u0159ekvapen\u00ed spojen\u00e9 s mno\u017estv\u00edm CO2 v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e bylo zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed, jak se lidstvo pod\u00edl\u00ed na celkov\u00e9m kolob\u011bhu CO2 v p\u0159\u00edrod\u011b (\u0159\u00e1dov\u011b maxim\u00e1ln\u011b 10 procenty) a jak konkr\u00e9tn\u011b p\u0159isp\u00edv\u00e1 ke kolob\u011bhu CO2 lidsk\u00e1 \u010dinnost v Evrop\u011b. Lidsk\u00e1 \u010dinnost v cel\u00e9 Evrop\u011b se pod\u00edl\u00ed na celkov\u00e9m kolob\u011bhu CO2 na Zemi maxim\u00e1ln\u011b jedn\u00edm procentem. T\u00edmto jedn\u00edm procentem tedy m\u016f\u017eeme jako Evropan\u00e9 kolob\u011bh CO2 ve sv\u011bt\u011b ovlivnit. Klimatologov\u00e9 ale nepracuj\u00ed p\u0159i sv\u00fdch \u00favah\u00e1ch s mno\u017estv\u00edm populace na Zemi. Ne\u017e Evropan\u00e9 sn\u00ed\u017e\u00ed sv\u00e9 emise CO2 na polovinu nebo nulu, p\u0159ibude na sv\u011bt\u011b p\u016fl miliardy lid\u00ed a emise CO2 se zv\u00fd\u0161\u00ed bez ohledu na Evropu. Paradoxn\u011b \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 konference o klimatu nezmi\u0148uje jako p\u0159\u00ed\u010dinu zm\u011bn klimatu popula\u010dn\u00ed explozi a nenavrhuje \u017e\u00e1dnou kontrolu nebo regulaci lidsk\u00e9 populace. P\u0159i hled\u00e1n\u00ed informac\u00ed o mno\u017estv\u00ed CO2 v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e lze naj\u00edt informace s jednotkami PPM (Parts per million). Ty se pou\u017e\u00edvaj\u00ed k definov\u00e1n\u00ed velmi n\u00edzk\u00fdch stopov\u00fdch koncentrac\u00ed, nap\u0159\u00edklad v roztoc\u00edch. V na\u0161em p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b je to po\u010det molekul CO2 v milionu molekul atmosf\u00e9ry. Uv\u00e1d\u011bn\u00e9 zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed z 300 na 400 PPM vypad\u00e1 hroziv\u011b, i kdy\u017e se jedn\u00e1 o stopov\u00e9 mno\u017estv\u00ed, kter\u00e9 je re\u00e1ln\u011b velmi t\u011b\u017eko zm\u011b\u0159iteln\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

T\u0159et\u00ed m\u00e9 p\u0159ekvapen\u00ed bylo, na jak element\u00e1rn\u00ed probl\u00e9m se vlastn\u011b scvrkla cel\u00e1 sou\u010dasn\u00e1 Teorie Glob\u00e1ln\u00edho oteplov\u00e1n\u00ed. Tato teorie pracuje jen s emisemi sklen\u00edkov\u00fdch plyn\u016f, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e emise nejv\u00fdznamn\u011bj\u0161\u00edho sklen\u00edkov\u00e9ho plynu, vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ry, vlastn\u011b ignoruje. D\u00e1le v\u016fbec nebere v \u00favahu tepeln\u00e9 emise lidsk\u00e9 civilizace. Podstata t\u00e9to teorie je stru\u010dn\u011b matematicky vyj\u00e1d\u0159ena tak, \u017ee vzestup obsahu CO2 v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e o ka\u017ed\u00fdch 10 jednotek PPM pr\u00fd zp\u016fsob\u00ed oteplen\u00ed o 0,1\u00b0C. Krom CO2 tato teorie bere v \u00favahu emise metanu a dal\u0161\u00edch plyn\u016f, kter\u00e9 se pod\u00edl\u00ed men\u0161\u00ed m\u011brou na sklen\u00edkov\u00e9m efektu. Vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ra, kter\u00e1 je zodpov\u011bdn\u00e1 za p\u0159ibli\u017en\u011b 2\/3 sklen\u00edkov\u00e9ho efektu je touto teori\u00ed ignorov\u00e1na. P\u0159ipou\u0161t\u00ed pouze, \u017ee vlivem oteplen\u00ed zp\u016fsoben\u00e9ho emisemi CO2 dojde k zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed mno\u017estv\u00ed vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ry v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e, a to pos\u00edl\u00ed sklen\u00edkov\u00fd efekt. Zde bych vysv\u011btlil, \u017ee mno\u017estv\u00ed vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ry v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e je d\u00e1no zejm\u00e9na teplotou atmosf\u00e9ry. Tato teorie tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee mno\u017estv\u00ed vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ry v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e je omezeno fyzik\u00e1ln\u011b s teplotou vzduchu a p\u0159ebyte\u010dn\u00e9 mno\u017estv\u00ed se vysr\u00e1\u017e\u00ed a spadne jako d\u00e9\u0161\u0165. \u010clov\u011bk pr\u00fd toto mno\u017estv\u00ed nijak neovliv\u0148uje.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tady bych zm\u00ednil dal\u0161\u00ed p\u0159ekvapen\u00ed v souvislosti s touto Teori\u00ed \u0161kodlivosti CO2. \nJak jsem ji\u017e uvedl v\u00fd\u0161e, tato teorie d\u016frazn\u011b odm\u00edt\u00e1, \u017ee se \u010dlov\u011bk pod\u00edl\u00ed na zvy\u0161ov\u00e1n\u00ed mno\u017estv\u00ed vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ry v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e. To je kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00fd probl\u00e9m t\u00e9to teorie. Pokud to nen\u00ed pravda, je tato teorie chybn\u00e1, proto\u017ee vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ra je nejv\u00fdznamn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed sklen\u00edkov\u00fd plyn. Auto\u0159i t\u00e9to teorie se vypo\u0159\u00e1dali s ot\u00e1zkou vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ry velice jednodu\u0161e. Vysloven\u011b tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee energie lidsk\u00fdch topeni\u0161\u0165 je zanedbateln\u00e1 oproti energii p\u0159ich\u00e1zej\u00edc\u00ed ze Slunce, a tepeln\u00fd v\u00fdkon lidsk\u00e9 civilizace tedy nem\u016f\u017ee ovlivnit mno\u017estv\u00ed vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ry v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e. Podrobn\u00fdm zkoum\u00e1n\u00edm energetick\u00e9 bilance zem\u011b lze snadno prok\u00e1zat, \u017ee toto tvrzen\u00ed je nepravdiv\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abychom si tuto kl\u00ed\u010dovou ot\u00e1zku vysv\u011btlili, budeme muset ud\u011blat v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed rozbor energetick\u00e9 bilance planety Zem\u011b. Na \u00favod bych \u0159ekl, \u017ee pokud se uv\u00e1d\u00ed pojem energie v t\u011bchto souvislostech, jedn\u00e1 se zpravidla o tepelnou energii vy\u010d\u00edslenou za \u010dasov\u00e9 obdob\u00ed. To je z fyzik\u00e1ln\u00edho pohledu tepeln\u00fd v\u00fdkon. Na zemi dopad\u00e1 energie ze Slunce a ta se \u010d\u00e1ste\u010dn\u011b odr\u00e1\u017e\u00ed a \u010d\u00e1ste\u010dn\u011b absorbuje atmosf\u00e9rou i zemsk\u00fdm povrchem. D\u00e1le se Zem\u011b oh\u0159\u00edv\u00e1 geoterm\u00e1ln\u00edm teplem z nitra zem\u011b a tak\u00e9 tepeln\u00fdm v\u00fdkonem cel\u00e9 lidsk\u00e9 civilizace + dal\u0161\u00edmi vlivy. Podstatn\u00e9 pro udr\u017een\u00ed tepeln\u00e9 rovnov\u00e1hy je okem neviditeln\u00e9 infra\u010derven\u00e9 tepeln\u00e9 z\u00e1\u0159en\u00ed, kter\u00e9 Zem\u011b vyza\u0159uje jako ka\u017ed\u00e9 t\u011bleso s teplotou vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e absolutn\u00ed nula. Tato vyza\u0159ovan\u00e1 energie je vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e energie absorbovan\u00e1 ze slune\u010dn\u00edho z\u00e1\u0159en\u00ed. D\u016fvodem jsou uveden\u00e9 dal\u0161\u00ed zdroje tepla na zemi a infra\u010derven\u00e9 z\u00e1\u0159en\u00ed, kter\u00e9 se vrac\u00ed k zemi d\u00edky sklen\u00edkov\u00e9mu efektu v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e. Mno\u017estv\u00ed vyza\u0159ovan\u00e9 energie t\u011blesem je d\u00e1no Stefan-Boltzmannov\u00fdm z\u00e1konem a je z\u00e1visl\u00e9 na \u010dtvrt\u00e9 mocnin\u011b absolutn\u00ed teploty t\u011blesa ve\u00b0K (m\u011b\u0159eno od absolutn\u00ed nuly). Mno\u017estv\u00ed vyz\u00e1\u0159en\u00e9ho tepla ze Zem\u011b je tedy d\u00e1no teplotou povrchu Zem\u011b i jeho atmosf\u00e9ry. Pokud zv\u00fd\u0161\u00edme mno\u017estv\u00ed tepla na Zemi, zv\u00fd\u0161\u00ed se jej\u00ed teplota, dojde k vyz\u00e1\u0159en\u00ed v\u00edce tepla a nastane nov\u00e1 energetick\u00e1 rovnov\u00e1ha. Matematick\u00e1 z\u00e1vislost se \u010dtvrtou mocninou teploty umo\u017en\u00ed s pom\u011brn\u011b mal\u00fdm zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00edm teploty vyz\u00e1\u0159it pom\u011brn\u011b velk\u00fd n\u00e1r\u016fst tepla. Tepeln\u00e1 soustava Zem\u011b je d\u00edky tomuto mechanismu stabiln\u00ed. Zem\u011b se dlouhodob\u011b nach\u00e1z\u00ed v ur\u010dit\u00e9 energetick\u00e9 tepeln\u00e9 rovnov\u00e1ze. Ke zm\u011bn\u00e1m pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00e9 teploty pak doch\u00e1z\u00ed vlivem takzvan\u00e9 energetick\u00e9 nerovnov\u00e1hy Zem\u011b. To je v\u011bdeck\u00fd term\u00edn EEI (Earth Energy Imbalance). V\u011bdci tuto nerovnov\u00e1hu m\u011b\u0159\u00ed \u0159adou m\u011b\u0159en\u00ed a \u010didel na Zemi i na dru\u017eic\u00edch. P\u0159esn\u00fd zp\u016fsob hodnocen\u00ed nezn\u00e1m. V\u011bdci tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee d\u00edky tepeln\u00e9 kapacit\u011b oce\u00e1n\u016f nedoch\u00e1z\u00ed k okam\u017eit\u00e9 zm\u011bn\u011b pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00e9 teploty Zem\u011b, ale tato zm\u011bna m\u00e1 jist\u00e9 zpo\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed. Energetick\u00e1 nerovnov\u00e1ha Zem\u011b se pr\u00fd zv\u00fd\u0161ila za posledn\u00ed desetilet\u00ed na dvojn\u00e1sobek a dos\u00e1hla v\u00fdkonu 460 Terawatt (TW).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nyn\u00ed tento v\u00fdkon srovn\u00e1m s tepeln\u00fdm v\u00fdkonem cel\u00e9 lidsk\u00e9 civilizace. Ten se skl\u00e1d\u00e1 z energetick\u00e9 spot\u0159eby lidstva (okolo 10TW), kter\u00e1 se spot\u0159ebou zm\u011bn\u00ed v teplo. D\u00e1le je jeho sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed v\u00fdkon odpadn\u00edho tepla p\u0159i v\u00fdrob\u011b elektrick\u00e9 energie v elektr\u00e1rn\u00e1ch a v dal\u0161\u00edch tepeln\u00fdch stroj\u00edch. D\u00e1le \u0159ady tepeln\u00fdch zdroj\u016f v pr\u016fmyslu a zem\u011bd\u011blstv\u00ed. Celkov\u00fd tepeln\u00fd v\u00fdkon lidsk\u00e9 civilizace je odhadov\u00e1n na 18TW. Ve srovn\u00e1n\u00ed s EEI se jedn\u00e1 o 4% z uv\u00e1d\u011bn\u00e9 hodnoty 460 TW s t\u00edm, \u017ee v p\u0159edchoz\u00edch desetilet\u00edch byl pod\u00edl energie lidsk\u00e9 civilizace okolo 8% EEI. Hodnoty 4% a\u017e 8% opravdu nejsou zanedbateln\u00e9 hodnoty a jedn\u00e1 se jen o p\u0159\u00edm\u00fd energetick\u00fd pod\u00edl lidstva na Energetick\u00e9 nerovnov\u00e1ze Zem\u011b. D\u00e1le je t\u0159eba si uv\u011bdomit, \u017ee tento podstatn\u00fd pod\u00edl na EEI se pod\u00edl\u00ed na zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed teploty atmosf\u00e9ry a to se t\u00e9\u017e prom\u00edt\u00e1 do zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed mno\u017estv\u00ed vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ry v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e. To ostatn\u011b nen\u00ed velk\u00e9 p\u0159ekvapen\u00ed, kdy\u017e si nap\u0159\u00edklad uv\u011bdom\u00edme, jak\u00e9 mno\u017estv\u00ed tepla vypou\u0161t\u011bj\u00ed jen tepeln\u00e9 a jadern\u00e9 elektr\u00e1rny ze sv\u00fdch chlad\u00edc\u00edch v\u011b\u017e\u00ed p\u0159\u00edmo s vodn\u00ed p\u00e1rou. Sklen\u00edkov\u00fd efekt, kter\u00fd zp\u016fsob\u00ed vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ra, kter\u00e1 je v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e d\u00edky emitovan\u00e9mu teplu lidsk\u00e9 civilizace pak nep\u0159\u00edmo zvy\u0161uje pod\u00edl lidstva na EEI a to ji\u017e pravd\u011bpodobn\u011b v \u0159\u00e1du des\u00edtek procent. Nejedn\u00e1 se tedy o skute\u010dnosti, kter\u00e9 bychom mohli ignorovat p\u0159i zkoum\u00e1n\u00ed glob\u00e1ln\u00edho oteplov\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jak jsem ji\u017e uvedl v\u00fd\u0161e, sou\u010dasn\u00e1 uzn\u00e1van\u00e1 Teorie glob\u00e1ln\u00edho oteplov\u00e1n\u00ed ale energetick\u00fd v\u00fdkon lidsk\u00e9 civilizace zcela ignoruje jako margin\u00e1ln\u00ed. Argument jej\u00edch zast\u00e1nc\u016f je v tom, \u017ee tepeln\u00fd v\u00fdkon lidstva je jen jednou desetitis\u00edcinou energie Slunce, kter\u00e1 dopad\u00e1 na Zemi. Jedn\u00e1 se zjevn\u011b o selektivn\u00ed a manipulativn\u00ed tvrzen\u00ed k odveden\u00ed pozornosti od zkoum\u00e1n\u00ed vlivu tepeln\u00e9ho v\u00fdkonu lidsk\u00e9 civilizace na oteplov\u00e1n\u00ed atmosf\u00e9ry. Jak jsem vysv\u011btlil v\u00fd\u0161e, je Slune\u010dn\u00ed energie jen jednou ze slo\u017eek energetick\u00e9 bilance Zem\u011b, kter\u00e1 je dlouhodob\u011b v jist\u00e9 rovnov\u00e1ze d\u00edky masivn\u00edmu infra\u010derven\u00e9mu z\u00e1\u0159en\u00ed, kter\u00e9 Zem\u011b vyza\u0159uje do vesm\u00edru.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pro hrubou p\u0159edstavu hlavn\u00edch tepeln\u00fdch tok\u016f vkl\u00e1d\u00e1m grafick\u00e9 zobrazen\u00ed. \nKr\u00e1tkovlnn\u00e9 z\u00e1\u0159en\u00ed ze Slunce dopad\u00e1 na zemsk\u00fd povrch a atmosf\u00e9ru. Dlouhovlnn\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1st tepeln\u00e9ho z\u00e1\u0159en\u00ed je emitov\u00e1na z povrchu a t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 zcela absorbov\u00e1na do atmosf\u00e9ry. V tepeln\u00e9 rovnov\u00e1ze je absorbovan\u00e1 energie z atmosf\u00e9ry stejn\u00e1 jako ta vyd\u00e1van\u00e1 do vesm\u00edru. \u010c\u00edsla ukazuj\u00ed v\u00fdkon z\u00e1\u0159en\u00ed ve wattech na metr \u010dtvere\u010dn\u00ed v obdob\u00ed let 2000\u20132004. Energetick\u00e1 nerovnov\u00e1ha EEI je zde vyj\u00e1d\u0159ena hodnotou tepeln\u00e9ho v\u00fdkonu 0,9 W\/m2, kter\u00fd z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1 na Zemi. Je t\u0159eba zkoumat, jak se energie lidsk\u00e9 civilizace pod\u00edl\u00ed na tomto \u00fadaji, kter\u00fd zp\u016fsobuje oteplov\u00e1n\u00ed Zem\u011b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

M\u016f\u017eeme si nyn\u00ed srovnat, s jakou relevanc\u00ed pracuj\u00ed klima odborn\u00edci s \u010d\u00edseln\u00fdmi \u00fadaji. Absolutn\u00ed pod\u00edl CO2 v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e se zv\u00fd\u0161il za 100 let o jednu desetitis\u00edcinu. Tato desetitis\u00edcina m\u00e1 pro n\u011b jinou v\u00e1hu ne\u017e tepeln\u00fd v\u00fdkon lidstva, kter\u00fd p\u0159edstavuje desetitis\u00edcinu energie dopadaj\u00edc\u00ed na Zemi ze Slunce. Vzhledem k v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00fdm \u00fadaj\u016fm k EEI je z\u0159ejm\u00e9, \u017ee srovn\u00e1vat energii lidstva s dopadaj\u00edc\u00ed energi\u00ed ze Slunce na Zemi je zav\u00e1d\u011bj\u00edc\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Celkov\u00fd vliv energie Lidsk\u00e9 civilizace na EEI se zapo\u010dten\u00ed sklen\u00edkov\u00e9ho efektu lidstvem emitovan\u00e9 vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ry dosahuje pravd\u011bpodobn\u011b n\u011bkolika des\u00edtek procent EEI, Tento vliv je \u00fazce spjat s mno\u017estv\u00edm obyvatelstva a jeho civiliza\u010dn\u00edmi pot\u0159ebami. V\u011bdci o t\u00e9to skute\u010dnosti taktn\u011b ml\u010d\u00ed. Tento postoj nen\u00ed v\u011bdeck\u00fd ale p\u0159\u00edkladn\u011b typicky politick\u00fd. Politici si zpravidla vyb\u00edraj\u00ed jen \u00fadaje, kter\u00e9 se jim hod\u00ed pro sv\u00e1 tvrzen\u00ed, a ostatn\u00ed souvislosti a data zaml\u010d\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

V souvislosti s uveden\u00fdm vlivem emitovan\u00e9 tepeln\u00e9 energie lidskou civilizac\u00ed na energetickou nerovnov\u00e1hu Zem\u011b je t\u0159eba si uv\u011bdomit, \u017ee z energetick\u00e9ho hlediska zat\u011b\u017euj\u00ed klima tepeln\u00e9 elektr\u00e1rny, jadern\u00e9 elektr\u00e1rny i sol\u00e1rn\u00ed elektr\u00e1rny podobn\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem. V\u017edy je k elektrick\u00e9mu v\u00fdkonu p\u0159id\u00e1n srovnateln\u00fd v\u00fdkon odpadn\u00edho tepla emitovan\u00fd do atmosf\u00e9ry a i vyroben\u00e1 elektrick\u00e1 energie se spot\u0159ebov\u00e1n\u00edm zm\u011bn\u00ed v teplo. P\u0159edstavy, \u017ee ochlazen\u00ed atmosf\u00e9ry provedeme instalac\u00ed mno\u017estv\u00ed jadern\u00fdch nebo termojadern\u00fdch zdroj\u016f energie, jsou zcela iluzorn\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pohled na no\u010dn\u00ed satelitn\u00ed fotografii USA, ukazuje p\u0159\u00edkladn\u011b jak cel\u00fd kontinent z\u00e1\u0159\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

M\u011bsta sv\u00edt\u00ed, top\u00ed, elektr\u00e1rny b\u011b\u017e\u00ed a energie civilizace emituje teplo do atmosf\u00e9ry i v noci bez slune\u010dn\u00edho z\u00e1\u0159en\u00ed. Toto teplo m\u00e1 jist\u011b vliv na mno\u017estv\u00ed vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ry, kter\u00e1 se udr\u017e\u00ed v ovzdu\u0161\u00ed a ta ovliv\u0148uje sklen\u00edkov\u00fd efekt. Tepeln\u00e9 a jadern\u00e9 elektr\u00e1rny emituj\u00ed mno\u017estv\u00ed tepla a nejv\u00fdznamn\u011bj\u0161\u00edho sklen\u00edkov\u00e9ho plynu-vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ry. Spalov\u00e1n\u00edm uhlovod\u00edkov\u00fdch paliv doch\u00e1z\u00ed nejen k emis\u00edm CO2 ale i p\u0159\u00edmo k emis\u00edm vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ry, kter\u00e1 spalov\u00e1n\u00edm vznik\u00e1 a tepla, kter\u00e9 ji v atmosf\u00e9\u0159e udr\u017e\u00ed. Pokud jsou tyto skute\u010dnosti \u0159adu let bagatelizov\u00e1ny a zaml\u010dov\u00e1ny v\u011bt\u0161inou v\u011bdc\u016f, nepova\u017euji to za chybu ale za z\u00e1m\u011br. Zda\u0148ovat vodn\u00ed p\u00e1ru by byl v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed probl\u00e9m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pokud chce n\u011bkdo zjistit p\u0159\u00ed\u010diny r\u016fzn\u00fdch povst\u00e1n\u00ed, revoluc\u00ed a v\u00e1lek, doporu\u010duj\u00ed historici sledovat cestu pen\u011bz. Lze tento postup aplikovat i na p\u0159\u00edpad zkoum\u00e1n\u00ed teorie \u0161kodlivosti CO2? Kdo s touto teori\u00ed p\u0159i\u0161el? Kdo tuto teorii finan\u010dn\u011b podporuje? Kdo a jak\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem na n\u00ed profituje? Na tyto ot\u00e1zky je t\u0159eba hledat odpov\u011bdi. P\u0159i ofici\u00e1ln\u00edm v\u00fdkladu klimatolog\u016f jsem se dozv\u011bd\u011bl, \u017ee tato teorie pr\u00fd vznikla na z\u00e1klad\u011b zad\u00e1n\u00ed velk\u00fdch poji\u0161\u0165ovac\u00edch a finan\u010dn\u00edch spole\u010dnost\u00ed, kter\u00e9 zaj\u00edmala rizika ohro\u017euj\u00edc\u00ed jejich zisky. Uk\u00e1zalo se pr\u00fd, \u017ee nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00edm rizikem ztr\u00e1ty zisk\u016f jsou emise CO2. M\u016fj osobn\u00ed n\u00e1zor, kter\u00fd samoz\u0159ejm\u011b nikomu nevnucuji je, \u017ee tato Teorie o \u0161kodlivosti CO2 vznikla na zak\u00e1zku, a c\u00edlem zadavatel\u016f je d\u00edky n\u00ed sv\u00e9 zisky zv\u00fd\u0161it. Sou\u010dasn\u00e9 emisn\u00ed povolenky jsou podle m\u011b podvodem stolet\u00ed s c\u00edlem okr\u00e1dat obyvatelstvo a p\u0159esouvat majetek st\u0159edn\u00ed t\u0159\u00eddy do rukou nejbohat\u0161\u00ed skupiny. Zkoum\u00e1n\u00ed finan\u010dn\u00edch tok\u016f mo\u017en\u00e1 uk\u00e1\u017ee, \u017ee Green Deal, elektromobilita i podpora migrace je podporov\u00e1n stejn\u00fdmi finan\u010dn\u00edmi skupinami jako Teorie \u0161kodlivosti CO2 s podobn\u00fdmi ekonomick\u00fdmi c\u00edli.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Na z\u00e1v\u011br bych r\u00e1d uvedl, \u017ee smyslem tohoto textu je upozornit na zav\u00e1d\u011bj\u00edc\u00ed zjednodu\u0161en\u00ed sou\u010dasn\u00e9 teorie oteplov\u00e1n\u00ed. Je t\u0159eba se za\u010d\u00edt seriozn\u011b zab\u00fdvat v\u0161emi skute\u010dn\u00fdmi p\u0159\u00ed\u010dinami oteplov\u00e1n\u00ed v\u010detn\u011b vlivu r\u016fstu populace na Zemi. Lidstvo Zemi p\u0159etv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed k obrazu sv\u00e9mu a mysl\u00edm si, \u017ee to je dob\u0159e. V\u011b\u0159\u00edm tomu, \u017ee i probl\u00e9m glob\u00e1ln\u00edho oteplov\u00e1n\u00ed lze v budoucnu uspokojiv\u011b \u0159e\u0161it s mo\u017enostmi, kter\u00e9 lidstvo m\u00e1. Je t\u0159eba si ale pravdiv\u011b vyjasnit v\u0161echny p\u0159\u00ed\u010diny i z\u00e1va\u017enosti zm\u011bn klimatu. Emisn\u00ed povolenky CO2 jsou dle m\u00e9ho n\u00e1zoru finan\u010dn\u00edm podvodem, kter\u00fd likviduje Evropu. Ty je dle m\u00e9ho n\u00e1zoru d\u016frazn\u011b a d\u016fsledn\u011b odm\u00edtnout v ka\u017ed\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b. V na\u0161\u00ed zemi tak\u00e9 p\u0159ehodnotit v\u00fdznam t\u011b\u017eby a vyu\u017eit\u00ed uhl\u00ed v energetice a hutnictv\u00ed. Jsou to na\u0161e vlastn\u00ed zdroje, u kter\u00fdch jsme sob\u011bsta\u010dn\u00ed. Platit pokuty za vyu\u017eit\u00ed uhl\u00ed pova\u017euji za nesmysl.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

V Praze<\/p>\n\n\n\n

14. 4. 2025    V\u00e1clav Knob <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I am a mechanical engineer by profession. I graduated from a technical high school with an aviation focus and then studied transport and handling technology at the Czech Technical University (CVUT), specializing in internal combustion engines. Due to serious health issues, I had to end my studies in the 5th year. I think I was […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":3585,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"disabled","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-knobgear-blog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/knobgear.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/knobgear.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/knobgear.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/knobgear.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/knobgear.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3584"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/knobgear.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3584\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3599,"href":"https:\/\/knobgear.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3584\/revisions\/3599"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/knobgear.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3585"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/knobgear.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/knobgear.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/knobgear.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}